* Anthony DeRobertis <[email protected]>, 2001-12-08, 10:43:
Seriously, why the second test? Assuming MD5 isn't horribly broken, there is a higher chance of a random bit error reading the data than of MD5 giving a false answer.
9 years later we know that MD5 *is* horribly broken. So I guess it's time to close this bug.
-- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
