On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:15:23 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 03:06 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > latex209 (25.mar.1992-12.4) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> > * Non-maintainer upload.
> > * debian/control
> > - latex209-base: need texlive-latex-base, not
> > texlive-base
> > (Closes: #607800)
>
> The actual change applied is:
>
> -Depends: texlive-base, texlive-binaries, ${misc:Depends}
> +Depends: texlive-base, texlive-latex-base, ${misc:Depends}
>
> which still includes texlive-base but removes texlive-binaries. Which
> is correct, the changelog or the control file?
>
AIUI the control file is correct. lasy5.tfm is in texlive-latex-base.Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
