Hi!
* Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> [2010-07-09 15:32:12 CEST]:
> I talked with upstream about the themes. The license holder did not
> know that the license he used would cause issues for us in Debian. He
> was more then willing to relicense.
>
> We took the themes from his site ( where they came from ) and removed
> the old ones. We then copied in the new themes from his site.
>
> The only change was the license text, so it just looks like a change
> on our part of the license text. That, however, is not true.
>
> See [1] for the upstream tarballs.
>
> The current issue is that it was building debian native ( because of
> the .tar name changing ), so it was changed to build properly.
>
> Since we are still using depatch, we have been looking to repack with
> quilt, so this is taking a long time.
Thanks for the fast response. So if the change is really only updating
the copyright information and not removal of some files that couldn't
have get updated, this means the bug can become safely ignored for
stable - and thus get closed for there (through tagging it + squeeze
sid).
If there though are things _beside_ relicensing of the files and thus
fixing the copyright information that have happened please don't tag the
bugreport as such and try to get the required changes into a stable
update. It still isn't completely crystal clear for me wether what
exactly was the case so I'm not doing it myself.
So long, and again, thanks for your fast response!
Rhonda
--
"Lediglich 11 Prozent der Arbeitgeber sind der Meinung, dass jeder
Mensch auch ein Privatleben haben sollte."
-- http://www.karriere.at/artikel/884/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
