Hi! * Denis Briand <[email protected]> [2010-06-05 19:32:08 CEST]: > * New dfsg compatible source tarball (Closes: #584513).
Now this really makes me wonder, can you please share some light: #v+ From: Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> Subject: Bug#584513: Too old license for the styles at tenr.de Message-ID: <[email protected]> This was forwarded from the copyright holder -Paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sven Michel <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:04 AM Subject: Too old license for the styles at tenr.de To: [email protected] Hi Paul, thanks for mentioning the license issue for the styles on tenr.de. I changed all of them to be licensed under CC SA 3.0. That's what each style file says and what's mentioned on the website now. #v- Denis, why did you DFSG repack the tarball? What exactly did you do? Remove the themes? Why so if they are now licensed CC SA 3.0? That license is DFSG free. This bugreport also applies to stable. If there are files really to get removed, they need to get removed in stable, too. If the files though are really all relicences, why repack the tarball in the first place? Denis, can you clearify on your changes and what's the plan to get this fixed for stable is? Thanks in advance! Rhonda -- "Lediglich 11 Prozent der Arbeitgeber sind der Meinung, dass jeder Mensch auch ein Privatleben haben sollte." -- http://www.karriere.at/artikel/884/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
