Hi,

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 05:47:08PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:12 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > It has only one reverse dependency, fusedav. That as well an outdated
> > > and incomplete package.
> > 
> > Incomplete in what respect? I do not consider software incomplete just
> > because of their (low) version number.
>  I mean #514330 [1] which states that fusedav can copy files to the DAV
> share, but can't read files _from there_ (neither copy or cat a file).

I was able to reproduce that but it does not happen all the time.
Unfortunately, I don't know yet how to reliably reproduce that and,
thus, don't know how to fix it. I will look into this in more detail as
time permits (or if I get actually struck by it ;-)).

> Also it's not ported to neon 0.27, which is released back in 2007
> august. Three years should have been enough for such a small change
> (your patch is short at least).

Well, as I said before, I did not see any need to do so, so far.

> > Possibly, fusedav could print a message telling the user
> > that it has been deprecated and pointing to davfs2. I'm gonna talk to
> > the upstream maintainer about that.
>  Would be nice if your upstream can comment this situation. Meanwhile
> please patch it to build with neon version 0.27 or above.

Yep, will do.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to