Hi, On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:12 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > > It has only one reverse dependency, fusedav. That as well an outdated > > and incomplete package. > > Incomplete in what respect? I do not consider software incomplete just > because of their (low) version number. I mean #514330 [1] which states that fusedav can copy files to the DAV share, but can't read files _from there_ (neither copy or cat a file). Also it's not ported to neon 0.27, which is released back in 2007 august. Three years should have been enough for such a small change (your patch is short at least).
> I (the maintainer of the Debian package) do not agree with that. The > last upstream version was released three years ago and I did not have > much reason to upload a new revision. OK, but does it work for you to read remote hosted files? > Possibly, fusedav could print a message telling the user > that it has been deprecated and pointing to davfs2. I'm gonna talk to > the upstream maintainer about that. Would be nice if your upstream can comment this situation. Meanwhile please patch it to build with neon version 0.27 or above. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514330 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
