On Thu, 13 May 2010, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 21:18 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > 'sm' is the source for r-cran-sm which is not the screen-message source > > giving you the sm binary. > > I filed the bug against the sm binary package, not the sm source > package. I was under the impression that the BTS could now handle this > properly. ow...@bugs.d.o, is that not the case?
This is the case, or at least, it should be. However, the whole idea of having source package which do not produce at least a binary of the same name is fundamentally broken, and I have spoken repeatedly against doing it. Don Armstrong -- The beauty of the DRUNKENNESS subprogram was that you could move your intoxication level up and down at will, instead of being caught on a relentless down escalator to bargain basement philosophy and the parking garage. -- Rudy von Bitter _Software_ p124 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
