On 13 May 2010 at 10:25, Paul Wise wrote: | On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 21:18 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > 'sm' is the source for r-cran-sm which is not the screen-message source | > giving you the sm binary. | | I filed the bug against the sm binary package, not the sm source | package. I was under the impression that the BTS could now handle this | properly. ow...@bugs.d.o, is that not the case?
I don't think so. I get about one or so a year for this package. One day I'll rename my several dozen r-cran-* packages such that all their source are also called r-cran-* but the renaming and stay in NEW is such a hazzle that I've shied away from it so far... -- Regards, Dirk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
