On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:45:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 03:33:22PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > Version: 1.3.1-9 > > > t1lib-old is now removed from unstable. > > It does not assure that package will be removed from etch too[1]. > > Have you an agreement with etch Release Manager about this bug. If not, I am > > going to reopen it. > > [1] There is still a package depending on t1lib-old in etch. > Yes, I have personally NMUed that last package, and it should reach testing > soon after ftp-master.debian.org is back on-line, at which point t1lib-old > will be removed. So, at least I don't *disagree* that the bug can be > closed. :) Enough for me :)
> OTOH, it seems incorrect to list 1.3.1-9 as the version that this bug was
> fixed in since 1.3.1-9 is the version still awaiting removal. That seems
> like a minor point to me, though.
Is there a better way to do it with new version tracking subsystem in BTS?
Regards
Artur
--
zjadłam ruskie i barszcz ukraiński.
ciekawe czy od tego dostanę automatycznie złotych zębów
/majaka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
