On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:34:29PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:45:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 03:33:22PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System > > > wrote: > > > > Version: 1.3.1-9 > > > > t1lib-old is now removed from unstable. > > > It does not assure that package will be removed from etch too[1]. > > > Have you an agreement with etch Release Manager about this bug. If not, I > > > am > > > going to reopen it. > > > [1] There is still a package depending on t1lib-old in etch. > > Yes, I have personally NMUed that last package, and it should reach testing > > soon after ftp-master.debian.org is back on-line, at which point t1lib-old > > will be removed. So, at least I don't *disagree* that the bug can be > > closed. :) > Enough for me :)
> > OTOH, it seems incorrect to list 1.3.1-9 as the version that this bug was > > fixed in since 1.3.1-9 is the version still awaiting removal. That seems > > like a minor point to me, though. > Is there a better way to do it with new version tracking subsystem in BTS? You may want to ask the BTS admins. My instinct is that the bug should be left "open", and the BTS should automatically treat it as closed after a period of time because of the package's removal, but I don't think it works like this yet. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
