reopen 534082
thanks

On 08/07/09 at 22:57 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> Thanks for your work. But the alternative to libboost1.37-dev:
> libboost-dev is available since May, so it should have been available
> during your rebuild in June too. I don't know, why the package failed to
> build, but it doesn't fail here. I'm going to close this report. If you
> still observe the problem, please reopen your report.

Hi Daniel,

(note that messages sent to the bug number aren't sent to the submitter.
You should Cc the submitter in such cases).

Alternatives in build-dependencies are not supported by sbuild, and are
a bad idea in general (because your package might end up being built
against different packages on different arches).
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to