*sigh* I begin to question the wizdom of agreeing that 510419 was actually a bug.
Yes, I think an extra internal flag is the right approach. I'm going to be mucking with kerberos-configs to get rid of krb4-configshortly and will deal. However if we get any more problems with 510419, I'm going back to my original position that the state of whether you expect the KDC information to need to be in krb5.conf can live in debconf and that is not an abuse of debconf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
