-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >On Sunday 01 March 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:34:39AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >> >Shouldn't this BR be tagged wontfix? >> >> Actually, no: I am no longer against dropping the noxpm flavor. > >OK. I ran into this because inn2 needs a recommends or suggests on >libgd-gd2-(no)xpm-perl and was wondering if both variants should >provide a pseudo package (as the regular libs do) to make such a >dependency easier.
I decided to not hide behind a virtual or pseudo package, because packages depending on GD really needs to decide if XPM support is needed or not. >But if the variants can be dropped, that would of course be simpler. Sure :-) >Please remember to inform packages with reverse deps of the change if >you do drop the noxpm flavor. Yes, I am aware that this is part of the transition task. Thanks for reminding me anyway! - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmqdDsACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjbkgCfSaznd3vickP+N+viCOZFAHBP PvQAmwbvi4xfrWHhZntW9p53sKOAB09k =booU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
