> Yes, but it will receive less testing than if you upload to unstable, and
> later
> ask for an unfreeze. That's why leaving the possibility of uploading to
> unstable
> to transition to testing is desirable.
yes -- but that would happen only IF the bug is really serious
(security, policy, etc); the last changelog entry is dated Mon, 09 Jun
2008, and I don't see any security bug closed in the last year. So, what
is the probability to get a need for a fix for something very
intrusively, so that lots of testing (ie presence in unstable) is
needed?
I am just sharing my opinion (it is worthless to keep Debian users of
unstable away from fresh releases ATM); I fully appreciate maintainer
decision to ship fresh version into experimental ;)
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-1412 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
