* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:30:44 +0100]:
> * Daniel Baumann [Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:24:14 +0100]:
> > since the description clearly states that it is experimental, it's
> > better to have it in than out because it makes backporting easier
> > (limits interdiffs), gets more attention by people.
> What is the action to take if a user installs btrfs in stable, finds a
> "data loss" bug, and reports it as grave? "Sorry, although you installed
> this from stable this software is experimental and you should've read
> the description and anyway the bug you report does not happen in the
> version in backports.org."?
I didn't receive any comments on this. I believe removing btrfs-source
from testing is a reasonable thing to do, and hence I'm going forward
with it. I'm sorry should you not find it in you to look at this
constructively.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
A lie can go round the world before the truth has got its boots on.
-- Terry Pratchett
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
