On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:40:45AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
> In the file "Search Term Reference", we see
>
> Example 2.2. Use of the ?bind term
>
> ?for x: ?depends(?depends(?for z: ?x:depends(?=z)))
>
> See the section called “Explicit search targets” for more information.
>
> The problem is that
> ?for x: ?depends(?depends(?for z: ?x:depends(?=z)))
> doesn't mention the word "bind" anywhere.
>
> Maybe like the Dalai Lama, its presence pervades, but for the basic
> user, without more cushioning explanation, it looks like the wrong
> example was pasted.
Whoops. It should say something like "Use of the ?bind(x, p) or ?x:p term".
Either that, or just give both forms, e.g.
?for x: ?depends(?depends(?for x: ?bind(x, ?depends(?=z))))
?for x: ?depends(?depends(?for x: ?x:depends(?=z)))
I think I'll include both forms, since it succinctly makes the point
that they're equivalent.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
