Hi Teodor, On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Teodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recommend to upload vuze_3.1.1.0 in NEW and request removal on > azureus from unstable for the following reasons: > * azureus has 3 RC bugs and sooner or latter will be removed from lenny [1]; > * vuze_3.0.5.0-1 depends on two packages which are no longer available [2]; > > Considering that the big blocked for azureus is the upload of > 'openjdk' I recommend to not waste time fixing azureus (probably > package 3.0.5.2 along with some bug fixes) and go for vuze_3.1.1.0 in > lenny (azureus being a dummy package depending on vuze). > > Thanks for your response. > > [1] > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=azureus&archive=no&pend-exc=pending-fixed&pend-exc=fixed&pend-exc=done&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious&repeatmerged=no > [2] http://packages.debian.org/sid/vuze
Vuze 3.1.1.0 built and run with surprising ease. The source zip finally includes a build script! I'm considering uploading it as azureus 3.1.1.0 rather than changing the package name at this point. Not much has changed in the source code. The jar file, for example, is still named Azureus2.jar. I don't feel that there's much to be gained by renaming the source package to vuze. Cheers, Shaun -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]