merge 487512 489445 kthxbye On 7/5/08, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In just four weeks, I'm leaving on vacation for ten weeks. That being > the case, I'm not sure I want to push vuze 3.1.1.0 into the archive in > time for etch, since I won't be around to help with bugs. On the plus > side, azureus 3.0.5.0 already includes a dummy package named vuze that > depends on azureus as well as the necessary packages for the web > browser that vuze embeds. So, if someone running etch installs the > package 'vuze', they should get what they expect. On the downside, > this means I can't just package vuze 3.1.1.0 as a new package with a > new name and upload it, because it would conflict with the vuze > package in azureus 3.0.5.0. I just downloaded vuze 3.1.1.0 and I'll > see if it builds and runs without too much trouble.
Hi Shaun, I recommend to upload vuze_3.1.1.0 in NEW and request removal on azureus from unstable for the following reasons: * azureus has 3 RC bugs and sooner or latter will be removed from lenny [1]; * vuze_3.0.5.0-1 depends on two packages which are no longer available [2]; Considering that the big blocked for azureus is the upload of 'openjdk' I recommend to not waste time fixing azureus (probably package 3.0.5.2 along with some bug fixes) and go for vuze_3.1.1.0 in lenny (azureus being a dummy package depending on vuze). Thanks for your response. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=azureus&archive=no&pend-exc=pending-fixed&pend-exc=fixed&pend-exc=done&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious&repeatmerged=no [2] http://packages.debian.org/sid/vuze -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
