Mike Hommey wrote: > The fact is users don't *always* have to set this, because far from all > websites require it. If so many users were impacted, we would be drowned > under piles of bug reports about this issue, yet, there is only a few of > them (only one, iirc).
A few user reports of sites that don't work. http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/05/msg00532.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/05/msg00631.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/05/msg00580.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/05/msg00074.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/11/msg01517.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/11/msg00346.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/09/msg01956.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/08/msg02474.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/08/msg02480.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/08/msg02362.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/08/msg02074.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/07/msg02776.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/04/msg04484.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/04/msg04382.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg03730.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg03183.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/12/msg00334.html http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=26760&highlight=firefox+iceweasel+agent http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=14861&highlight=firefox+iceweasel+agent http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=21889&highlight=firefox+iceweasel+agent (Incomplete for forums.d.n) -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
