On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Greetings, Asheesh (and others following this conversation),
I don't know if the mailutils packaged as part of uw-imap is better or
worse than yours.
But uw-imap and alpine is quite similar, even in coding style. How would
you like it we maintain both packages together?
Ssince uw-imap and alpine are separately released source bundles from
washington.edu, it seems like it'd be easiest to have them remain separate
source packages.
I am fond of cdbs. And am familiar with using svn-buildpackage but have
also begun using git-buildpackage for my most recent packaging. I'll go
have a closer look at alpine packaging to get a feeling about your
packaging habbits after writing this email...
You can take a look - I hope you don't find them too messy. (-:
I haven't had very good luck with cdbs, but I'm willing to be proven
wrong.
I think that since they're really separate source packages there's not
much reason to merge them. What do you think on that matter?
-- Asheesh.
--
Carswell's Corollary:
Whenever man comes up with a better mousetrap,
nature invariably comes up with a better mouse.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
