On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Package: alpine
Version: 1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.6(4)
Shipping mailutil (and its manpage) straight up leads to file
conflicts with the uw-mailutils package, which already supplies both.
I'm specifically assigning this to alpine because uw-mailutils has
precedence, but you're most welcome to address it in either or both
(for instance by means of update-alternatives).
Wow, that's embarrassing. I'll release a -3 pretty immediately that
removes the file.
Dear UW Mailutils package tracker recipients of this message: is your
version of mailutils as up-to-date (or more) as alpine's, as well as
DFSG-compliant? If so I'm perfectly satisfied to never release a mailutil
binary in the alpine packageever again....
-- Asheesh.
--
What you don't know can hurt you, only you won't know it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
