Hi, On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 13:41 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > That's a side-effect of the change introduced for #383542 in the last > > version, in order not to create changelogs resembling the above but only > > one block per maintainer. > > Eh, I object. When I added multi-maintainer support to dch, I explicitly > made it support multiple blocks per maintainer, because I know that in > complex packages with lots of maintainers, one maintainer's changelog > entry often depends on an earlier changelog entry by a different > maintainer, and needs to come last. Please don't break this.
When I mentioned it on IRC, people seemed to favour the new behaviour. You're obviously in rather a stronger position to disagree than anyone else however. :-/ Any objections to making the choice of old or new behaviour configurable? Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
