On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:21:06PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > See fs/proc/array.c in linux source to see the actual values, but the > > description of /proc/[process]/stat is just plain wrong (fields missing, > > bad ordering, bad scanf things formats). > > Please be precise: which fields are missing, which are out of order, which > formats are bad?
Well, there is too many to express the diff directly, moreover I'm not sure about what means the new ones. Just get fs/proc/array.c from the mainline kernel, you'll see them there. But for instance the 'starttime' is _just after_ the '0' place holder, not after itrealvalue. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpXd7p1ECYe4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
