Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:21:06PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: >>> See fs/proc/array.c in linux source to see the actual values, but the >>> description of /proc/[process]/stat is just plain wrong (fields missing, >>> bad ordering, bad scanf things formats). >> Please be precise: which fields are missing, which are out of order, which >> formats are bad? > > Well, there is too many to express the diff directly, moreover I'm not > sure about what means the new ones. Just get fs/proc/array.c from the > mainline kernel, you'll see them there. > > But for instance the 'starttime' is _just after_ the '0' place holder, > not after itrealvalue.
Hello Pierre, Either there are a lot of problems, and the diff is hard to make but there should be at least several examples to cite, or there are just a few problems (see Justin's mail). Which is it please? Cheers, Michael PS In case it's not clear: I'm asking you to help fix the problem, rather than just saying there is one (initially without any supporting evidence). -- Michael Kerrisk maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/ read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
