On Saturday 03 March 2007, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > in fact, without _fully_ understanding the implications, i simply > cut/paste the code from wdm to create the kdm patch,
Ohh.. you are expecting people to apply the patches you don't fully understand the implications ? > and the reason it > was rejected was because the original wdm selinux code had an obscure > error-case _tiny_ memory leak. AFAICS, freecon is a now deprecated, but was then something like free(), so it is not a memory leak, but a double free. If you can't tell the difference between double free and memleaks, I am glad that we haven't applied the patch yet. > i mean, how _utterly_ pathetic and small-minded is that. eh ? take your flames elsewhere. > so. > anyway. > small memory leak. > in wdm selinux. I guess patches are most welcome ? > fix that. > shoot the kde maintainer of kdm - get another one. Eh ? Take your death-threats elsewhere. /Sune -- Do you know how could I insert in a hardware from Word 6.7 and from Explorer or from the preferences inside X-Windows? You should never install a head to remove the AT case.
pgpM0T7HBEI5k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
