Le samedi 11 novembre 2006 à 11:13 +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:14:38AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > I don't think that's a problem with the freedesktop standard, although I > > agree it should be extended to support them. Currently, xsessions are > > defined by .desktop files put in /usr/share/xsessions. > > How are they defined ? Where are the spec?
They are standard .desktop files, only their location is different. > What is a session manager ? > Is e.g. flwm a session manager ? Why twm is not ? http://www.xfree86.org/current/xsmp.pdf > A lot of window-managers listed in /usr/share/xsessions are no more no > less session-manager than twm, AFAICS. > > Extending the Debian menu protocol to mark session manager is trivial, > but that suppose to have a definition of session-manager. We can either be strict about them, asking them to implement the XSM protocol, or simply ask the maintainer to be reasonable about the window manager being usable as a standalone environment - which e.g. metacity and kwin are not. And while I don't know about twm enough, I'm 100% sure these two shouldn't appear in the options proposed by GDM. -- Josselin Mouette /\./\ "Do you have any more insane proposals for me?"
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
