Mats Erik Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This bug/deficiency has a trivial solution, in my
> view at least. Is there some reason the attached patch
> should not be applied to the upstream original? There
> is indeed a minute risk that the timing inside the
> shell between the actions
I personally liked this patch. Does any other maintainer disagree with
me? Otherwise I can commit it.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
