user [email protected] usertag 388952 + no-cooperation thanks
> I could argue my case with you, but I see no point in it. If you have gone > through all the trouble to do a massive bug posting against most likely > countless hundreds of packages, you will stand your ground and refuse to > capitulate no matter how sound my logic, or articulate my debate. Why are you assuming that at least I won't listen to your arguments? As I explained, doing a mass bug filing is certainly not something that one does without prior thinking, given the amount of work involved. Up to now, you have not given a single explanation about your motivations to not follow the suggestion I am giving here. So you don't even give me a chance to understand why you refuse that change and thus improve the MBF process. So far, your only point in this argument has been "oh yes it is" just like in a famous Monty Python sketch which I can point you to if you're too young for this culture. I don't exactly call this negotiating but rather arguing (*this* reference is a little bit more recent). > If this holy jihad continues, I will seek other remedies as afforded by the > Debian social contract. I'm afraid that *you* are insulting. Or at least, you want to be insulting. Unfortunately, it seems that your deep ignorance of the exact meaning of the word "jihad" in the muslim culture prevents you from understanding that I should feel honored by this word. So, indeed, thank you for using it...this is really appreciated. I would indeed be really glad to see what would happen if you choose "the other remedies offered by the Social Contract"...but, dear, I'm afraid I already know the result and I don't really like when fellow developers feel ridiculous.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
