On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:29:34PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote: > >No, you should file a separate bug against swat, because the bug you're > >describing shows no evidence of being related to the bug that 363523 was > >filed for.
> Ah - do you mean the bug 36523 was samba (presumably smbd) segfaulting > and not swat itself segfaulting? I mean that just because both problems are segfaults does not mean they're the same bug. > Anyway, I've filed a new bug report (Bug#385400: Acknowledgement (swat: > SWAT segfaults when fiddling with printer settings)). Debugging symbols > for swat might be helpful. Could I recompile swat with debugging > symbols straightforwardly? "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us -B" should get you binaries that are built with debugging options, although the final package building will fail for other reasons, but you can grab the swat binary out and copy it to /usr/sbin/swat easily enough for testing purposes. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
