At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:09:49 +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:49:07AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > The bug still remains but with lvm2 working around it it becomes > > wishlist. I still think this should be fixed for sarge so > > documentation and implementation are in sync for stable. > > A similar problem happened before with O_DIRECT and was left > unfixed for months. > > Somebody ought to address the root cause: why aren't the > installed header files kept closely in step with the kernels?
Because glibc package is under base freeze for sarge - and many packages depend on it under 11 official architectures. OTOH, why don't lvm2 package have O_NOATIME definition itself for a while? However I possibly update another release for sarge: 2.3.2.ds1-21 (which may have O_NOATIME definition, plus some requests). Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
