Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> close 360606 1.17-22
>> thanks
>>
>> Ian Jackson writes ("psnup showpage fix mistakenly not included?"):
>>> I'm sorry, I didn't to pay proper attention to the bug status. I now
>>> see that the bug report was closed, by a changelog entry in 1.17-22.
>>> However, the source code change to psspec.c was not included.
>>
>> And I was wrong about that too. I was misled by the hideous patch
>> system the package is using. Sorry for bombarding you with useless
>> mails.
>>
>> Do you think a patch system like this is really necessary for
>> psutils ?
>
> Hello. I just got back into town after a week away and am technically
> still "on vacation" according to the debian LDAP. In any case, thanks
> for testing the psnup showpage patch. I will include it in my next
> upload.
Of course, I had already included the patch, so I suppose there's no
further action required on this. Thanks again for the patch.
For what it's worth, my local copy of the package includes a change to
the changelog entry to fix my typo in your email address. I know it's
generally not considered good practice to modify old changelog
entries, but I believe that fixing a typo isn't "changing history" and
is acceptable. Anyway, there was a long thread on debian-devel about
this when I was still in the NM queue......
--
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
