It is accepted now Am 07.03.26 um 14:27 schrieb Arto Jantunen:
Arto Jantunen <[email protected]> writes:Mechtilde Stehmann <[email protected]> writes:Hello Arto, Am 07.03.26 um 08:45 schrieb Arto Jantunen:The upstream author has defined the preferred license as GPLv3+, even though the file content includes the strings "license" and "ISC", which the tool interprets as having a meaning that it does not have (it is not the license of the file, it is the license of the typescript package being described, which does not exist and isn't meant to exist as the file is a test fixture of an application licensed under the GPL).And who is the author of the two files? The upstream author cannot ignore the license of that two files, esp. if s(he) isn't the author of the two files. Only the author(s) of the two files can decide what the meaning is not a maintainer or anyone else.The author of those two files is João Távora, see: https://github.com/joaotavora/rassumfrassum/blame/455fd84a9be7537edee6d5ceca79c08e6f1ed360/test/ts-preset/fixture/package.json and https://github.com/joaotavora/rassumfrassum/blame/455fd84a9be7537edee6d5ceca79c08e6f1ed360/test/ts-preset-streaming/fixture/package.json They have specified that the license of those files is the GPL, version 3 or later, which you want us to override to be something else instead.In the interests of moving things forward in a constructive way, I have uploaded a new version of the package with the requested changes. Someone else already filed an RC bug against licenserecon (#1129997) where the copyright file has the same issue (except much worse than here). The handling of that bug can then instruct us on what the correct solution is for this package.
-- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
