Mechtilde Stehmann <[email protected]> writes:
> Hello Arto,
>
> please list these two files with their license separatly
>
> test/ts-preset/fixture/package.json
> test/ts-preset-streaming/fixture/package.json
>
> Thanks
>
> Further information may be found at:
>    https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/rassumfrassum
>
> Regards, Mechtilde Stehmann
> Member of the DFSG, Licensing & New Packages Team

Hi Mechtilde,

This looks like a false positive by the licenserecon tool that was used.
The mentioned files are fake JSON definitions of typescript packages,
used as test fixtures. A definition like that contains a "license" field
that triggers the tool.

These aren't real packages, there is no source code. As far as I
understand these test fixtures have been written by the same author and
are a part of the this package and if any copyright license applies to
them (I'm not a lawyer but if I was and you'd pay me a couple of
thousand dollars I'd tell you that they aren't copyrightable) it's the
same one that applies to the rest of it (GPLv3+).

I can of course easily add specific mentions of these files to the
copyright file with a different license, but as far as I can tell that
would make the information incorrect. Should I do that, or upload the
package again as-is, or...?

-- 
Arto Jantunen

Reply via email to