Hi, On 20/09/25 at 11:57 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > tags 1115824 - bookworm > thanks > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 08:54:20AM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > Control: merge 1114250 -1 > > > > See that bug for my analysis of this particular case. > > > > More generally: to avoid similar duplicate filings in the future, should we > > be adding the 'ftbfs' tag to existing bugs? > > The short answer is yes. The ftbfs tag helps to avoid duplicates > (because we typically use UDD to search for already existing bugs > having the tag). > > However, this does not explain this particular duplicate...
Sorry, I missed #1114250. If the failure is about tests failing during build (as opposed to tests in autopkgtest), it's useful to mention it in the bug title to avoid the confusion. > Moreover, I can build pagure just fine in bookworm, so I don't > understand this line used by Lucas in this case: > > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > > Lucas: Did you use an old template for this bug? (when bookworm was > the current testing). Yes, wrong template, sorry Lucas
