Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2025-03-21 11:57:14) > Looking at the package tracker at > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-axum, it appears to me that > migration to testing is held up. It also occurs to me that debci > triggers autopkgtest against rust-tonic 0.10.2, which fails. I believe > that > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rust-axum/-/commit/103234e21b365f8b0f1f4fc09e136dd4f4243d86 > would help debci and help the migration scripts finding that rust-tonic > and rust-axum need to migrate together.
Thanks for reporting, Reinhard! I agree that Breaks seems to help migration, but only while rust-tonic 0.10 exists in a Debian branch: rust-tonic itself is pending migration to 0.12 rendering the Breaks obsolete. Question then is if it is worth the additional maturing time (ideally 3 days but potentially more) or it is better to "let it run its course". Seems to me that the main blocker for a larger transition is rust-rustls-pemfile, but I am not sure - debci failures seem weird. @Blair, since you did the ITP, what do you think? > Jonas, I'm happy to assist with uploads. Let me know your preference, > happy to NMU or maintainer upload at your choice. Thanks, but I think it is better we let Blair deal with it as collateral of his (quite helpful!) ITP. As mentioned above one possible action might be to simply giving it more time. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
