Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2025-03-21 12:49:37) > On 2025-03-21 07:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2025-03-21 11:57:14) > >> Looking at the package tracker at > >> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-axum, it appears to me that > >> migration to testing is held up. It also occurs to me that debci > >> triggers autopkgtest against rust-tonic 0.10.2, which fails. I believe > >> that > >> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rust-axum/-/commit/103234e21b365f8b0f1f4fc09e136dd4f4243d86 > >> would help debci and help the migration scripts finding that > >> rust-tonic > >> and rust-axum need to migrate together. > > > > Thanks for reporting, Reinhard! > > > > I agree that Breaks seems to help migration, but only while rust-tonic > > 0.10 exists in a Debian branch: rust-tonic itself is pending migration > > to 0.12 rendering the Breaks obsolete. > > > > Question then is if it is worth the additional maturing time (ideally 3 > > days but potentially more) or it is better to "let it run its course". > > In my experience with previous packages, without the breaks, the release > team needs to add a hint to britney to help detecting that both packages > need to migrate at the same time. > > I'd be thrilled to be proven wrong on this point, though.
Hmm - I would be less thrilled learning a week from now that this was the cause of causing unneeded release team intervention, so perhaps my speculations are better tested another less pressured time. @Blair, will you handle this, or do you prefer that I take over again, now that my study pace has lowered again? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
