See changes here: https://github.com/neurodroid/stimfit/commit/7941cd06
and package here: https://mentors.debian.net/package/stimfit/ > On 7 Feb 2025, at 14:02, Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org> wrote: > > Am Fr., 7. Feb. 2025 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber > <chris...@gmx.de>: >> >> >>> On 7 Feb 2025, at 01:50, Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> Yes that would be appreciated >>> >>> mentors.d.n should still work fine, if you upload the package there, I can >>> have a look! :-) >>> >> >> Here you go: >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/stimfit/ >> > > Nice, thank you! > The package could really need a bit of modernization, but that can be > done iteratively and demanding this now for what is essentially a > bugfix to the archive wouldn't be fair. > Still, can you make these changes for me please? > * Change the pkg-config build dependency to pkgconf? (without it, > we'll immediately get a bug report against the package about this > post-upload) > * Please drop the build-dependency on dh-autoreconf > * Please modernize the debian/watch file a little, this should work > and shouldn't catch "debian-suffixed" versions: > ``` > version=4 > > opts=filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz/stimfit-$1\.tar\.gz/ \ > https://github.com/neurodroid/stimfit/tags .*/v?(\d[\d.]+)\.tar\.gz > ``` > * Please replace Priority: extra in stimfit-dbg with "optional" as > priority (in the long run, now that we have automatic debug symbols, > the package could even be replaced, but no rush!) > > Those are the most pressing things, in the long run it would be very > nice to also update to a much higher debhelper version and simplify > d/rules with dh sequencer, and also to bump the standards version. > Maybe it would also be worth considering to you to maintain the > packaging in a Git repository on Salsa, maybe even under the science > team umbrella? => https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ > That would make it a lot easier to collaborate, and you could set the > Vcs-* fields for a bit more automated QA. > But that's optional :-) > > I think with these changes, the package is good to go! Can you make > them and reupload to mentors? (I'll just run a few tests on the Python > module still before uploading) > > Thank you for all the work!! > Cheers, > Matthias > > -- > I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/
