Le samedi 24 août 2024, 13:35:03 UTC Paul Gevers a écrit : > Hi Bastien, > > On 24-08-2024 15:18, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Le samedi 24 août 2024, 11:03:38 UTC Paul Gevers a écrit : > >> I'm wondering if you may have hardened cacti and that if fails on that > >> now. If this is to be expected, the string can be added to the "ignore" > >> lines. I'm not an SRM, so I wonder how much time you still have. It > >> might be better to have cacti in bookworm now, albeit with a broken test. > > > > Can we have a stuff like on elts with a special queue that need dcut > > migrate ? > > cacti has already been accepted into proposed-updates. The tests are run > to inform everyone of issues, to enable actions if needed. It's not nice > and trivial (IIUC) but if a package has issues, SRM can choose to skip > it when the point release is cut. Alternatively they can ignore the > failure and nothing special needs to happen in that case. Is that what > you're asking (I'm not sure I understood your question correctly)?
Ok, but lts and elts team use something better a private queue that need manual dcut migrate command that could be run only after debci job In all the case see salsa here https://salsa.debian.org/debian/cacti/-/commit/49fcdcab9bbcbd9d202ed8d09ae2961c46f75fb5/pipelines?ref=bookworm It seems for me green light But if you want I could release ASAP or wait next iteration fixing last CVE openned Bastien > Paul >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
