On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:23:05 +0000 Colm Buckley <c...@tuatha.org> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:38:12 +0100 Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:12:21PM +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > With the new vmlinux.h shipped in the headers package, the BTF case > > > should be covered. > > > > The relevant code in Linux is: > > > > | quiet_cmd_btf_ko = BTF [M] $@ > > | cmd_btf_ko = > \ > > | if [ ! -f vmlinux ]; then > \ > > | printf "Skipping BTF generation for %s due to > unavailability of vmlinux\n" $@ 1>&2; \ > > | else > \ > > | LLVM_OBJCOPY="$(OBJCOPY)" $(PAHOLE) -J $(PAHOLE_FLAGS) > --btf_base vmlinux $@; \ > > | $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -b vmlinux $@; > \ > > | fi; > > > > Which change is needed here to use vmlinux.h instead? > > My understanding is that you don't need this command at all; the included > vmlinux.h already contains the necessary type definitions for libbpf, for > the kernel source version in question - ie: instead of needing to run > pahole or bpftool to extract these definitions from a specific vmlinux > image, this file is distributed with them already included.
Yes precisely, the bpf program source can just include vmlinux.h and it should build and run as expected. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
