Why was this never the case before? And can you be more precise about what
"stuff" is missing? Is there a previous bug report I can reference?
DKMS should handle its own dependencies, I'd have thought - I see a clear
use case for installing header files without the corresponding images.
Colm
On Thu 29 Feb 2024, 10:31 Bastian Blank, <wa...@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 wontfix
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:19:39PM +0000, Colm Buckley wrote:
> > The linux-headers packages for kernel version 6.6 seem to depend on the
> corresponding
> > linux-image packages, but I believe that this should not be the case
> (and was not the
> > case in previous versions).
>
> It should. The build wants the image available (it does not really fail
> without, but lacks stuff) and we need some dependency to keep image and
> headers in sync for people using dkms.
>
> Bastian
>
> --
> Vulcans never bluff.
> -- Spock, "The Doomsday Machine", stardate 4202.1
>
