Free Ekanayaka <fr...@debian.org> writes: > Hi Mathias, > > Mathias Gibbens <gib...@debian.org> writes: > >> Hi Free and Laszlo, >> >> On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 10:31 +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: >>> As a consequence, I've renamed the libraft2 binary package to >>> libraft0. Note that libraft0 already exists in bullseye, but there's >>> nothing depending on it, so even in the weird case where somebody >>> downloads libraft0 from sid and installs it in bullseye, nothing >>> should break. >> >> Free, have you tested the upgrade path from a bullseye system with >> libraft0 installed incrementally through to sid? Even though it's >> probably a remote edge case, we should make sure the upgrade path works >> smoothly. (Both with just libraft0 installed directly, as well as >> indirectly by something like dqlite.) > > I've tried the upgrade path from bookworm to sid, both with just > libraft2 installed directly as well as indirectly via dqlite. > > For bullseye there's only the case of libraft0 installed directly, since > there's no dqlite in bullseye. I'll test the incremental upgrade to > bookworm and then to sid and let you know.
I've tested the bullseye -> bookworm -> sid incremental updgrade, both with only bullseye's libraft0 installed and with lxd/libdqlite0/libraft2 installed after upgrading to bookworm. The upgrade was fine in both cases (and lxd also keeps actually working in the second case). Free
