On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 16:15:43 +0000 Philip Wyett <philip.wy...@kathenas.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 16:24 +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > > It would be nice to have glabels 4.x in Debian. Could you consider > > packaging it? Yes, I already thought about it. Given its development came a long way now, it might make sense to have it in Debian. > and as it suggests the 4.x development of this new major version is > QT based only. > > The choice here is to find out if 3.x will be maintained and do we > package as 'glabels-qt' as a separate package entirely. Many > questions to be answered. There doesn't really seem to be any activity on 3.x anymore. I intend to contact upstream about maintenance and small bugfixes given 3.x will be around for some time. 4.x being a rewrite, I intend to package independently. Most probably as glabels-qt as upstream calls it that way. Cheers, sur5r -- ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam.
pgpJHsJW7sHMl.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature