On 12 Sep 2019, at 10:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Source: binutils
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: alpha ia64
>
> Hello!
>
> binutils is currently BD-Uninstallable on alpha and ia64 because it
> build-depends
> on the libc6-dev package on these architectures. However, neither alpha nor
> ia64
> provide that package, they actually have a libc6.1-dev package.
Also affects kfreebsd (libc0.1) and hurd (libc0.3). This isn't actually a bug
in the source however, but a bug in the .dsc itself uploaded to the archive,
which differs in its Build-Depends field; not sure what happened here...
> jrtc27@coccia:~$ diff -u <(awk '/^Build-Depends:/{s=$0; next} /^ /&&s{s=s$0;
> next} s{print s; s=""} END{if (s) print s}'
> /srv/mirrors/debian/pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.32.51.20190909-1.dsc |
> sed 's/,/&\n/g') <(tar -O -xf
> /srv/mirrors/debian/pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.32.51.20190909-1.debian.tar.xz
> debian/control | awk '/^Build-Depends:/{s=$0; next} /^ /&&s{s=s$0; next}
> s{print s; s=""} END{if (s) print s}' | sed 's/ */ /g;s/,/&\n/g')
> --- /dev/fd/63 2019-09-12 09:46:12.544764354 +0000
> +++ /dev/fd/62 2019-09-12 09:46:12.532764072 +0000
> @@ -30,4 +30,4 @@
> g++-i686-linux-gnu [amd64 arm64 ppc64el x32] <!nocheck>,
> g++-x86-64-linux-gnu [arm64 i386 ppc64el x32] <!nocheck>,
> g++-x86-64-linux-gnux32 [amd64 arm64 i386 ppc64el] <!nocheck>,
> - libc6-dev (>= 2.29) | libc6.1-dev (>= 2.29) | libc0.1-dev-i386 (>= 2.29) |
> libc0.3-dev (>= 2.29)
> +
James
