reassign 350989 gcc-3.3 thanks On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:52:32PM +0200, Juha Jäykkä wrote: > > I think this bug can be closed? Or do you think it needs to be > > assigned to some other package? > > I think it should definitely get fixed since it makes life very hard for > people with AFS $HOMEs. Which program/package is responsible for the bug, > I cannot tell, however. What about trying to bug the gcc people next? =) I > think that would be our best shot. > > Personally, I avoided the whole thing by compiling everything on a local > fs instead, but that is just a workaround, which happens to be acceptable > to my specific case. Reassigning seems the best way to proceed anyway.
So I've reassigned it to the gcc-3.3 package, as that seems to be what you were using. They will probably want to know if the same happens with newer versions like 4.0 or 4.1. Kurt
