Hi,

On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 00:11:37 +0900
Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> wrote:
> you are maintaining both ttf-adf-accanthis and fonts-adf-accanthis.
> Both are shipping the same files.
> fonts-adf-accanthis provides/replaces/conflicts with ttf-adf-accanthis,
> but ttf-adf-accanthis is still a normal package with all the fonts.
>
> This is *not*good*.
>
> Please provide a transitional packages
> ttf-adf-accanthis
> which:
> - depends on fonts-adf-accanthis
> - does not ship any fonts

 I've looked into (ttf|fonts)-adf packages.

$ ls -al fonts-adf_0.20110505.orig.tar.gz ttf-adf_0.20090423.orig.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 henrich henrich 9294398 10月 20 2016 
fonts-adf_0.20110505.orig.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 henrich henrich 15055654 5月 7 2009 ttf-adf_0.20090423.orig.tar.gz

 It's very different size, and both contains lot of upstream fonts from
 http://arkandis.tuxfamily.org/adffonts.html . It generates several binary
 font package, but it's better to do packaging for each font and make
 fonts-adf as meta package, IMO.


> The same goes for all the other (ttf|fonts)-adf-* packages.

ttf-adf-accanthis
ttf-adf-baskervald
ttf-adf-berenis
ttf-adf-gillius
ttf-adf-ikarius
ttf-adf-irianis
ttf-adf-libris
ttf-adf-mekanus
ttf-adf-oldania
ttf-adf-romande
ttf-adf-switzera
ttf-adf-tribun
ttf-adf-universalis
ttf-adf-verana

fonts-adf-accanthis
fonts-adf-baskervald
fonts-adf-berenis
fonts-adf-gillius
fonts-adf-ikarius
fonts-adf-irianis
fonts-adf-libris
fonts-adf-mekanus
fonts-adf-oldania
fonts-adf-romande
fonts-adf-switzera
fonts-adf-tribun
fonts-adf-universalis
fonts-adf-verana

 It seems that same binary package (but why upstream tarball size is so
 different?)


 Anyway, how about reconstruct fonts-adf-* package with individual
 source package and fonts-adf meta package?


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

Reply via email to