I only support the released version of make. I opened a make bug report: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=15182
I got no responses. If you want to use the unreleased make and think my patch is needed, you should work with make developers to resolve this. At least, you should make some comments on my bug report and ask them to include my patch. I will be happy to work with them to incorporate my patch into make. H.J. ---- On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:56:12PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006, Matthias Klose wrote: > > updated patch mentioned at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-02/msg00026.html > > It doesn't apply to the Debian source: > > bee% patch -p1 < txt00000.txt > patching file file.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 434. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file file.c.rej > patching file implicit.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 850 (offset 311 lines). > patching file main.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 540 (offset 39 lines). > patching file make.h > Hunk #1 succeeded at 431 (offset 4 lines). > patching file misc.c > Hunk #2 succeeded at 498 (offset -68 lines). > Hunk #3 FAILED at 825. > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file misc.c.rej > patching file read.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 1871. > Hunk #2 FAILED at 2017. > 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file read.c.rej > > As I said, I think there were some upstream changes concerning hash_* > functions, and I suspect the patch needs to be adapted to use these new > functions instead of adding its own copies. Otherwise, the changes > in this patch do not seem to be large or disruptive, and seem to apply > correctly (besides hashing functions). > > Bye, > > -- > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Current Earth status: NOT DESTROYED -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
