Axel Beckert writes ("Re: Bug#849867: xen-create-image: default config file
contains bad values"):
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I don't object to that lower value. There is certainly a strong
> > argument for being conservative at this stage of the Debian release.
>
> I'm actually still undecided. Bascially so far I kept it at the
> smallest sane-ish memory size, but your comment made me think if that
> scheme should be changed in general. I still have the feeling that
> half a gig or RAM is quite a lot for a small, but otherwise normal and
> not deliberately minimal VM, but 256 MB is indeed rather small
> nowadays. So e.g. 384 MB is also a value I currently think about.
Right. I don't really have a strong opinion or information.
> > I'm happy to help. My github username for work stuff is
> > `ijackson-citrix'.
>
> You should have gotten an invitation.
Yes, thanks, accepted.
> > For the avoidance of doubt, I understand that you intend to do the
> > upload and I shouldn't do anything. Of course your life may intervene
> > so you might not get round to it. When should I time out ? :-)
>
> /me grins. Actually I thought already about from when on an NMU makes
> sense.
>
> Let's say if I haven't uploaded a new version on 11th of January in
> the late (European) morning. Is that fine for you?
Sure, thanks. I have made a note.
Regards,
Ian.
