Hi again, sorry: missed one point:
On 10.12.2016 15:07, Ole Streicher wrote: > On 10.12.2016 14:48, Michael Biebl wrote: >> An obvious solution seemed to me, to make tasksel(-*) depend on >> blends-tasks. This why, the package would be marked as auto-installed, >> and should you later decide to implement that differently, say directly >> in tasksel, then tasksel can simply drop that dependency. >> I assume though you have considered this obvious solution and decided >> against it for some reason? If you mean here why we just didn't put blends-tasks as dependency into tasksel-data: this wouldn't help, since the Policy says (ยง2.5): "Packages must not depend on packages with lower priority values" Since tasksel-data is Priority: important, blends-tasks would need to have this priority as well. Ole
