On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:39:13AM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> > since there are no responses so far I wonder how to proceed with the
> > package.
>
> Yes, that's one of the bugs that has been on my list for a while as well...
>
> > I need to admit I get a different error when trying to build
> > the current state of gubbins packaging Git:
> >
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I../tests
> > -pthread -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/gubbins-2.1.0=.
> > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-run_all_tests.o `test -f '../tests/run_all_tests.c'
> > || echo './'`../tests/run_all_tests.c
> > /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -I../tests -pthread -g -O2
> > -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/gubbins-2.1.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
> > -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o run_all_tests
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_branch_sequences.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_gubbins.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_parse_phylip.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_snp_searching.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_snp_sites.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_vcf_parsing.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-helper_methods.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-run_all_tests.o -lcheck libgubbins.la -lz -lm -lrt
> > -lsubunit
> > libtool: link: gcc -I../tests -pthread -g -O2
> > -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/gubbins-2.1.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
> > -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -Wl,-z -Wl,now -o
> > .libs/run_all_tests ../tests/run_all_tests-check_branch_sequences.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_gubbins.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_parse_phylip.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_snp_searching.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_snp_sites.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-check_vcf_parsing.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-helper_methods.o
> > ../tests/run_all_tests-run_all_tests.o -lcheck ./.libs/libgubbins.so -lz
> > -lm -lrt -lsubunit -pthread
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check.o):
> > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when
> > making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check_error.o):
> > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when
> > making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check_msg.o):
> > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when
> > making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check_pack.o):
> > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when
> > making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check_run.o):
> > relocation R_X86_64_32 against undefined symbol `error_jmp_buffer' can not
> > be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check_str.o):
> > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when
> > making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check_log.o):
> > relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a
> > shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libcheck.a(check_print.o):
> > relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a
> > shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> > Makefile:742: recipe for target 'run_all_tests' failed
> > make[4]: *** [run_all_tests] Error 1
>
> This looks like a completely different issue altogether I have never
> seen, for me it was always failing tests.
>...
That's #837445 in the check package, which became fatal with gcc-6 in
unstable defaulting to PIE since this week Tuesday.
Building with gcc-6 from testing should work around this problem (untested).
> Cheers
> Sascha
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
