On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 06:54:00 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Debian::Control is independently useful. Please consider splitting it > into its own binary package, e.g. libdebian-control-perl.
This sounds like a reasonable idea, thanks for the proposal. - The question is what exactly we split out into which new package(s); currently the package contains the following modules (slightly reordered): -rw-r--r-- root/root 9026 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Config.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 7381 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Utils.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 1247 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Command/refresh_cache.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 6695 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Command/refresh.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 1119 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Command/dump_config.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 49429 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Command/Packaging.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 27340 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Command/make.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 2159 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Command/locate.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 1312 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/Command/help.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 4508 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl/PodParser.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 2737 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/DhMakePerl.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 11784 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/AptContents.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 10725 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Rules.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 2899 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/WNPP/Bug.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 5123 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/WNPP/Query.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 12697 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Dependency.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 7084 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Dependencies.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 4523 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/DpkgLists.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 5199 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Control.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 2209 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Control/Stanza/CommaSeparated.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 2592 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Control/Stanza/Source.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 4551 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Control/Stanza/Binary.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 19102 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Control/FromCPAN.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 7328 2016-04-11 23:04 ./usr/share/perl5/Debian/Control/Stanza.pm The DhMakeperl::* namespace seems clear; and then we have Debian::Control* but also other Debian::* modules, where we'd need to check high tightly they are tied into dh-make-perl or how generic and usuable they are. (And if we split out more, we need to think about a different name than libdebian-control-perl). Sean, do you need only Debian::Control::* o more? Dam and others, what are your thoughts from the dh-make-perl knowledge side? Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
